X-Plane Musings + 2

 

So, without making too fine a point here, another fun flight, a few more thoughts about playing around “up there” in X-Plane

I made a longer flight in XP this weekend, and I find myself returning to the program when writing proves too painfully introspective or I just need a break from doctors – and all their endless BS.EDDS1

Well, I picked up a bunch of European airport files late last week, and the airport imaged above is EDDS Stuttgart. I decided to “fly” from here to LFMN Nice, on the French Mediterranean, and it was fun, if challenging. At about 400 miles, such a flight takes a little more than an hour and involves flying over two sets of mountain ranges (the Swiss Alps and the so-called Mediterranean Alps that form the backdrop to Cannes, Nice, and Monte Carlo.

So, with the 733 gassed up and ready to go, off we went. I wanted to fly the entire flight under autopilot this time – simply to see if I understood how the system works when handling SIDS (Standard Instrument Departures) and STARS (Standard Instrument Approaches), as well as (potentially) holding patterns.

edds2

Leaving Germany under clear skies (above, and that’s EDDS almost under the left engine), this route took the 733 over Zurich…

edds3

(and that’s LSZH Zurich Kloten, above, under the left wing) along the way to the western half of the Swiss Alps. The 733 is at 20,000 feet here. Next stop, Milan:

edds4

Milan, Italy (above) after crossing the Swiss Alps, and now approaching the Mediterranean Alps.

Approaching the Med, the weather was deteriorating, and here’s where things get interesting in XP. You can set the program to download the weather in real-time, and XP will then adjust the conditions inside the SIM on the fly. Want to fly inside hurricane Harvey? XP can make that happen for you. A weather front full of tornados? Yup, XP can do that, too. If you have a large 4K monitor, you might keep a barf-bag handy. Don’t believe it? Turn out the lights and fly into a bad storm in a Baron or King Air. XP will shake the plane to pieces and it’s amazing how immersive the sensation can become.

edds5

So, XP was doing its thing, making the weather turn real crappy, real fast.

edds7

Flying instruments is a tough concept to deal with for people new to flying, and it takes hundreds of hours of flight time to become comfortable with all the details, yet in the end, it’s not really all that difficult, especially with modern autopilots. Below, out over the Med now, getting lined up for the final approach.

edds6

And, popping out of the clouds, with runway 4R in the center of the left windscreen.

edds8

By the by, here are a couple of examples of charts used for this type of approach. This first shows details on the instrument approach chart for runway 4R:

LFMN APP 1

This next is a STAR chart, detailing a Standard Approach to LFMN from the north, east, and southeast sectors:

LFMN APP2

If you do everything right, you end up with a view like this out the cockpit glass:

edds9

Note the position looks a little to the right? Well, that’s because there are two closely spaced parallel runways at this airport, and 4Right’s approach actually forms a shallow V-shape with 4Ls, giving more room if two aircraft happen to be shooting approaches at the same time.

edds10

And this is what you’re likely to see from the highway on the way to the airport…just another uneventful landing. Which is the result of hundreds of hours of training and thousands of hours as a journeyman apprentice in the right seat. Endless study – and now – lower pay.

And in all human history, there’s never been anything quite like it. If you think about it, two hundred years ago moving from Stuttgart to Nice would have entailed a journey of months along roads that were anything but paved. Now the trip takes a few minutes.

Here’s a thought to ponder: Isn’t that the definition of a time machine?

More in the next Musings.

 

4 thoughts on “X-Plane Musings + 2

  1. A Boeing, 737-700, and yes, all sorts of failures can occur, many leading to loss of the aircraft. Just as in a commercial level sim, failures can be random, or they can be programmed to occur. A linked series of cascading failures is what you usually get in an airline sim (aka Flight Safety), and XP can do some of that, as well.
    I think exploding engines are core feature of A-380s (and DC-10s), but yes, there’s a very in-depth simulation available for that aircraft in XP, too.

    Like

  2. A woman I graduated from UNH with worked for Pratt &Whitney for a number of years, and her job was literally abusing jet engines in a wind tunnel to try to get them to fail, including throwing dead birds into them.

    Like

    • Reminds me of a good one. A new tech working for Fokker in the Netherlands was doing much the same thing; he was supposed to load chickens into an air cannon, the birds to be fired into windscreens to test the resiliency of cockpit glass. Seems no one told him not to load frozen chickens, however. First shot blew through the glass and out the back of the test facility…
      I think, in any language, that’s a real Oops moment.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s